ad agency new business


The ad agency business is tough–everybody knows it, but things are getting better.
[Cue angelic music!]

A lot of marketers are hiring new ad agencies despite what you read.

Besides stand-out strategic work, one thing always separates thriving from surviving agencies: Attitude.

Not to come off as Tony Robbins, but here are 10 things I don’t hear from agencies who are winning new business:

1. Clients are wrong.
You’re not making your case–or maybe…you’re wrong.

2. Clients don’t get it.
You haven’t explained it well.

3. Clients are stupid (jerks, assholes, etc).
Leave the business now.

4. The work they have us doing is crap.
Show your brilliance. Imagine if Goodby, Silverstein & Partners thought that about milk.

5. They’d rather see us go out of business than pay us what we’re worth.
The best clients still want their agencies to succeed.

6. We should fire those bastards.
If you’re at this point, maybe that’d probably be best for everyone.

7.  They don’t respect us.
You haven’t earned it.

8.  They don’t appreciate our brilliance.
Perhaps you’re just off target. Dig in and collaborate. Or maybe you suck–they just don’t have the heart to tell you.

9. This RFP is a piece of crap.
Tighten it up. Show the client where they missed the mark. Stand out. Color outside the lines. Take a risk. Or don’t answer it.

10. This budget hardly makes it worth the work.
Fight for more money (but be able to back it up). Consider taking it at the budget offered, but if you do you don’t get to hold that against the client.

Have fun! This is still one of the best businesses in the world. Remember why you got into advertising in the first place and bring that to work every day. Your teammates will thank you and your clients will swoon.

I help companies find their ad agency –An Agency Search Consultant.  It’s a great gig.  I love it.  I’m good at it.

Usually I hear from CMOs, Marketing VPs, start-up companies, established brands.  Today I got a call from a Top Chef!  After the surprise wore off, we had a great chat.

topchef2

Since we try to keep searches confidential, I’ll decline to say who it is.  For now, I’ll just call them “Chef”.

I enjoyed watching Chef this season as they moved through the competition and was sad to see them eventually go.  But, that’s the way the cookie crumbles.  (I’ll try to avoid any more bad food puns.)

Suffice to say, Chef is talented, engaging, has a great story and is smart.  Smart because Chef wants to capitalize on their recent fame and continue to build their personal brand–and now is the time!  Besides that, I’m always up for a new challenge–and heck, it sounds like a lot of fun!

At this point I’m reaching out beyond my agency network to connect with specialists to help find “Chef” the right person, persons, or firms to pump up their brand.

This is completely preliminary. I’ve not had a detailed discussion yet to know “Chef’s” goals.  At this point, I’m just trying to find out who’s out there in preparation for our next call.

I envision getting “Chef” connected with a speaking bureau, an agent, a social media consultant, a public relations specialist, a publisher (think we may have a writer already), perhaps even a few brands who’d be interested in sponsorships.  At this point, all ideas are on the table.  I’ve already reached out to some folks I know, but perhaps I should know about you?

Email me if you’d like to discuss this further: david [at] marketinghitch dot com.

Well, it’s been an exciting and busy summer.  I’m talking to lots of agencies lately who are hearing the phones starting to ring again–which is good news for everybody.  That’s partly why it’s been nearly a month since a new Ad Industry Innovators series, everybody’s busy, including me.  I’m a little over two weeks from finishing up the first Hitch search–with a few other interesting potentials on the horizon so stay tuned for exciting news!

Robson_BW

Today’s Ad Industry Innovator is a shout out to the Emerald City with a Seattle agency called Creature.  New Business Director, Barton Bodell described Creature as their clients’ wild card agency.  The folks clients go to when they don’t want same old same old.  I thought that was a great description, so I’m going with it.

I interviewed Robson Grieve, who is Creature’s Managing Director.  He came to the agency after being a Creature client con Corbis.  ( 5 pts for reading that correctly out loud.)

1. What was the aha moment when you realized “our company needs to be doing things differently than we have been”?
The big “aha” moment for Creature happened back in Amsterdam, when Matt and Jim (co-creative directors) were talking about starting an agency. After working in a couple of the biggest and best agencies in the US (Wieden & Kennedy and Goodby Silverstein), they went to Europe and saw a different way of doing things. This old world+new world experience led the guys to the simple philosophy that “the best media space you can buy is in someone’s mind.” That idea really defines how we look at the changing relationship between consumers and brands, and it has shaped how we do our work on a day-to-day basis. The evolution from a “broadcast” model where advertisers were telling people what to think, to more of a cooperative model where we are starting a conversation with people and incorporating them in to the brand development process.
The truth is, however, that we are having “aha” moments all the time and we look at our model as a work in progress. We are constantly studying our capabilities and looking for ways to make Creature more relevant to current and future clients. Every year we seem to undertake one or two big changes, and we are constantly challenging the status quo and updating our business model. Essentially, we look at the search for “aha” moments as an every day part of the job.
2. What books are on your nightstand or great blogs on your Google reader?
I almost never read about advertising or business, because I find most business popular books to be a little too orderly in their analysis. There are a few notable exceptions, of course, but in general I try to find interesting/thought provoking books rather than books about business. I’m working on a pretty scary book right now – it’s called “Global Catastrophes and Trends.” It is a comprehensive look at the risks we face in the next 50 years by a university professor named Vaclav Smil. Smil has written a lot about energy and the environment, and has a very data driven perspective on projecting the future of the world. Before that, I read “The Black Swan: The impact of the Highly Improbable,” which was a really inspiring book that basically reinforced my belief that it is more important to be open to new things than it is to be expert at pattern recognition.
In terms of blogs, I read Mark Cuban’s blogmaverick.com a lot because he is such a firebrand, and has the ability to separate the hype from reality in new media. For social media stuff I read Logic+Emotion (darmano.typepad.com/). He has a nice theory-based approach to explaining social structures online. I am also a bit of an economic news junky, and my jumping off point there is a blog called “calculated risk” http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/ which has some interesting articles, and a wealth of links to top econ authors.
3. Give me an example of marketing you think is brilliant and why.
Michael Jackson. Look at how popular he is all of a sudden. Tough way to do it, but you have to give the guy credit for his commitment to the brand.
Seriously, this is a really difficult question to answer because some of the most examples that people use as great “marketing companies” aren’t marketing companies at all – they just make great products that people love. I would say that I have been pretty impressed with Fed Ex and how they have incorporated golf in to their brand. They created a great event with the PGA (The Fed Ex Cup), and they have succeeded in making the connection between golf and fed ex very natural through their advertising.
4. We’ve all read that the pitch / RFP process is broken.  Many agencies aren’t even interested in competing in pitches.  Do you see an alternative to this process?
I think it is convenient to complain about the RFP process. Is it fun to put a bunch of resources in to a high risk endeavor, with disappointment the most statistically likely outcome? Of course not, but I don’t see how the industry could come together and invent a method for pitching could be set up that would solve all the problems. Competitive bidding is a part of almost every industry’s procurement process, so agencies aren’t alone in being disappointed because they didn’t get a piece of business. Watch “Glengarry Glen Ross.” Life isn’t fair.
The thing agencies need to decide is how much they are willing to give in this process. This is an individual and situational decision. For example, at one extreme, some clients are demanding ownership of all ideas created for the pitch, and agencies just need to decide if they are willing to go that far. In some cases, the answer will be yes, in some cases it will be no.
There have been some crazy pitches the last few months (the famous “twitterfp” and Zappos are on people’s minds) that have people buzzing, and I would say that if they agencies don’t like the process, they should sit out. Or better yet, if agencies don’t like the process they should work with the client to shape the right process.
5. What does the agency of the future look like?
It is interesting to try to predict what the agency of the future looks like, because we are likely to be mostly wrong no matter what we predict. I think it is safe to say that it is likely we will be more similar to strategy consultants like Bain or McKinsey than we will be to old-line Madison Avenue agencies. I also think it is safe to say that we are going to need to be “cross trained” at every level, because the world isn’t going to be neatly organized by media like it has been in the past.
I do think that a lot of the speculation around ownership of ideas that has gone on is a little misleading. Big brands don’t need to share risk with agencies, so the expectation that they share rewards in a significant way is probably unfounded. Pay-for-performance is coming in some way, but I think it is going to end up being more of a cost cutting measure by corporations than it will be a chance for agencies to grow their piece of the pie.
6. What do marketers need that agencies are not giving them?
Marketers need agencies to solve problems – not just make ads. Too often agencies decide to make ads, even when they know that won’t solve the underlying problem. Our clients need us to be ready and willing to look at each engagement as a chance to solve an important problem – sometimes that will be through ads, sometimes it will be through something entirely unexpected.
7. Who do you admire and why?
I would say that I admire my business partners, Matt and Jim. They have had a lot of fortitude and foresight as entrepreneurs, and I am fortunate to get to work with them on a day-to-day basis.
In the agency business, I admire the guys at Goodby Silverstien. They have managed to reinvent themselves over and over, and that is no small feat in any industry.
I look at Tiger Woods as a role model from a competitive perspective. He has such great focus, and usually finds a way to be win even when he isn’t at his best.
8. Please include intro talking points about your company as referenced above.
About Creature
Creature is a Seattle-based independent advertising agency with a reputationfor operating beyond traditional thinking and reinterpreting advertising based on the idea-centric philosophy that the best media space you can buy is in someone’s mind. Since its inception in 2002, the agency has developed unique campaigns that invite audiences to experience a brand’s story in multiple connected ways. Creating a mix of films, theatrical productions, cups on cars, imaginary political movements, viral Web ideas, TV spots, print ads and other tactics, Creature has produced award-winning work for some of the world’s biggest brands. Current clients include brands such as Pacifico Beer, JanSport, Microsoft, and adidas to name a few. For more information, visit www.creatureseattle.com
Somehow this got caught in the “spam” folder – sorry.
The name is actually an old Canadian name (like the street in Vancouver).
I’m the Managing Director here, and have been here now about 3 years. Prior to joining Creature, I was actually a client of the agency when I was at the digital photography company Corbis, where I spent about 5 years in a variety of marketing and business development roles. My history is primarily in the technology and media industries.
Look forward to seeing the blog. Let me know if there is anything else I can do.
Thanks.
Robson

1. What was the aha moment when you realized “our company needs to be doing things differently than we have been”?

The big “aha” moment for Creature happened back in Amsterdam, when Matt and Jim (co-creative directors) were talking about starting an agency. After working in a couple of the biggest and best agencies in the US (Wieden & Kennedy and Goodby Silverstein), they went to Europe and saw a different way of doing things. This old world+new world experience led the guys to the simple philosophy that “the best media space you can buy is in someone’s mind.” That idea really defines how we look at the changing relationship between consumers and brands, and it has shaped how we do our work on a day-to-day basis. The evolution from a “broadcast” model where advertisers were telling people what to think, to more of a cooperative model where we are starting a conversation with people and incorporating them in to the brand development process.

The truth is, however, that we are having “aha” moments all the time and we look at our model as a work in progress. We are constantly studying our capabilities and looking for ways to make Creature more relevant to current and future clients. Every year we seem to undertake one or two big changes, and we are constantly challenging the status quo and updating our business model. Essentially, we look at the search for “aha” moments as an every day part of the job.

2. What books are on your nightstand or great blogs on your Google reader?

I almost never read about advertising or business, because I find most business popular books to be a little too orderly in their analysis.  There are a few notable exceptions, of course, but in general I try to find interesting/thought provoking books rather than books about business.  I’m working on a pretty scary book right now – it’s called “Global Catastrophes and Trends.”  It is a comprehensive look at the risks we face in the next 50 years by a university professor named Vaclav Smil.  Smil has written a lot about energy and the environment, and has a very data driven perspective on projecting the future of the world.  Before that, I read “The Black Swan: The impact of the Highly Improbable,” which was a really inspiring book that basically reinforced my belief that it is more important to be open to new things than it is to be expert at pattern recognition.

In terms of blogs, I read Mark Cuban’s blogmaverick.com a lot because he is such a firebrand, and has the ability to separate the hype from reality in new media.  For social media stuff I read Logic+Emotion.  He has a nice theory-based approach to explaining social structures online.  I am also a bit of an economic news junky, and my jumping off point there is a blog called “calculated risk” which has some interesting articles, and a wealth of links to top econ authors.

3. Give me an example of marketing you think is brilliant and why.

Michael Jackson. Look at how popular he is all of a sudden. Tough way to do it, but you have to give the guy credit for his commitment to the brand.

Seriously, this is a really difficult question to answer because some of the most examples that people use as great “marketing companies” aren’t marketing companies at all – they just make great products that people love. I would say that I have been pretty impressed with Fed Ex and how they have incorporated golf in to their brand. They created a great event with the PGA (The Fed Ex Cup), and they have succeeded in making the connection between golf and fed ex very natural through their advertising.

4. We’ve all read that the pitch / RFP process is broken.  Many agencies aren’t even interested in competing in pitches.  Do you see an alternative to this process?

I think it is convenient to complain about the RFP process. Is it fun to put a bunch of resources in to a high risk endeavor, with disappointment the most statistically likely outcome? Of course not, but I don’t see how the industry could come together and invent a method for pitching could be set up that would solve all the problems. Competitive bidding is a part of almost every industry’s procurement process, so agencies aren’t alone in being disappointed because they didn’t get a piece of business. Watch “Glengarry Glen Ross.” Life isn’t fair.

The thing agencies need to decide is how much they are willing to give in this process. This is an individual and situational decision. For example, at one extreme, some clients are demanding ownership of all ideas created for the pitch, and agencies just need to decide if they are willing to go that far. In some cases, the answer will be yes, in some cases it will be no.

There have been some crazy pitches the last few months (the famous “twitterfp” and Zappos are on people’s minds) that have people buzzing, and I would say that if they agencies don’t like the process, they should sit out. Or better yet, if agencies don’t like the process they should work with the client to shape the right process.

5. What does the agency of the future look like?

It is interesting to try to predict what the agency of the future looks like, because we are likely to be mostly wrong no matter what we predict. I think it is safe to say that it is likely we will be more similar to strategy consultants like Bain or McKinsey than we will be to old-line Madison Avenue agencies. I also think it is safe to say that we are going to need to be “cross trained” at every level, because the world isn’t going to be neatly organized by media like it has been in the past.

I do think that a lot of the speculation around ownership of ideas that has gone on is a little misleading. Big brands don’t need to share risk with agencies, so the expectation that they share rewards in a significant way is probably unfounded. Pay-for-performance is coming in some way, but I think it is going to end up being more of a cost cutting measure by corporations than it will be a chance for agencies to grow their piece of the pie.

6. What do marketers need that agencies are not giving them?

Marketers need agencies to solve problems – not just make ads. Too often agencies decide to make ads, even when they know that won’t solve the underlying problem. Our clients need us to be ready and willing to look at each engagement as a chance to solve an important problem – sometimes that will be through ads, sometimes it will be through something entirely unexpected.

7. Who do you admire and why?

I would say that I admire my business partners, Matt and Jim. They have had a lot of fortitude and foresight as entrepreneurs, and I am fortunate to get to work with them on a day-to-day basis.

In the agency business, I admire the guys at Goodby Silverstien. They have managed to reinvent themselves over and over, and that is no small feat in any industry.

I look at Tiger Woods as a role model from a competitive perspective. He has such great focus, and usually finds a way to be win even when he isn’t at his best.

#####

ESPN recently premiered Spike Lee’s new film Kobe: Doin Work, which was a day in the life of Kobe Bryant.  If you don’t know the name, Kobe is the guard for the L.A. Lakers, currently the best team in the NBA.

kobe_bryantOne of my favorite lines in the film was what Kobe’s high school coach told him years ago and he’s still tapping into the knowledge:

“You don’t build a house without blueprints.  You gotta know what you’re doing coming in”

The Lakers win championships because they know what they’re up against.  They study their opponents obsessively.  They know what they’re gonna do before the game starts because they know what their opponents are (most likely) going to do, and they play accordingly.

You could argue that The Lakers are pros, that they’re just plain better than most people when they pick up the round ball, but Kobe puts that myth to bed.  He makes a telling and simple statement in the voice over as he’s watching himself in a scene showing a particularly tight drive to the basket:

“A lot of this comes from film study because you know (from study) where the guy is gonna be .”

This is a basketball lesson from the best, but it’s also a business lesson and a life lesson, even if you’ve never knocked down a 3 pointer:  Study.  Be a little obsessive.  Know how your opponent is going to react.  Have a plan.  Know your goal is before you start to build.

Who’s studying your moves?  Whose moves are you studying?  Sometimes this attention to detail is the strategic edge you need to win.

I’ve got a new guest blog post directed at ad agency new business on Philip Reid’s WinningBusinessNow .

guest-post1

The second of hopefully many more.  Happy to be included, Philip.  Thanks for asking me.  If you’re looking for fresh content on ad agency new business development check out Philip’s site.

Next Page »

*